Ection criteria employed for the Facebook photos was applied for the series of 20 Media

Ection criteria employed for the Facebook photos was applied for the series of 20 Media images; thin-ideal M = four.three, SD = 1.16.Manipulation checkThe 7-item Stress subscale, among the four subscales in the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire ersion three (SATAQ-V3) [41], was made use of to assess perceived stress from media to order SR-3029 attain the thinideal on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Items were summed to get a score of thin-ideal internalisation at pre-exposure, with a high score indicating higher internalisation in the media’s thin-ideal. Previous function located that the Stress subscale (alpha = .84) considerably predicted higher BID within a sample of 401 female undergraduates [42]. The scale showed excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .83).Self-esteemA manipulation verify was included to make sure that participants paid adequate focus to the experimental stimuli. Participants had been asked to select two images that they viewed on the stimuli photos out of four attainable alternatives; two stimuli images, and two closely matchedRosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale [43] was made use of to measure baseline self-esteem. This 10-item scale requires participants to indicate their agreement with every statement on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to four (strongly agree). Resulting scores variety from 0 to 30, with larger scores indicating higher self-esteem. A study reported great reliability PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21301260 (alpha = .88) amongst a sample of Australian students [6]. The scale showed fantastic reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .88).Cohen and Blaszczynski Journal of Eating Problems (2015) three:Page four ofBody image dissatisfactionThe Body Locations Satisfaction Scale (BASS), one of many five subscales in the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales (MBSRQ) [44], was used to assess current perceptions of one’s body image, asking participants to reflect on their amount of satisfaction with nine aspects of their physical appearance, “as you really feel proper now”. For the objective from the existing study query taking a look at modifications in state BID following brief exposure, this subscale was applied to measure state BID at pre and post-exposure. Products were scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (quite happy) to 5 (really dissatisfied), with high scores indicating high state BID. The subscales showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .789). The literature shows that baseline BID moderates the connection involving media exposure and subsequent BID [7, 457]. Therefore it was essential to account for pre-exposure BID. Pre-exposure BID scores were subtracted from post-exposure BID scores to make a BID- change score. Unfavorable BID-change scores indicate a lower in BID from pre to post- exposure, whereas good BID-change scores indicate an increase in BID from pre to post- exposure.Appearance comparison1 (constantly) to six (never). This scale was reported to possess fantastic reliability (alpha = .90) among anorexia nervosa sufferers [48] and has been utilized to determine consuming disturbances in non-clinical samples [49]. Item scores have been summed for an all round test score, ranging from 0 to 78. Using suggestions for non-clinical samples [49], those that acquire a score of 20+ are considered higher threat of having an ED. For this study, the scale showed excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .870).ProcedureThe Human Research Ethics Committee with the University of Sydney authorized the study. Participants have been emailed the p.