Share this post on:

Owledgements and Funding KG is supported by an NHMRC Fellowship No 524413. The study was also supported by an NHMRC Capacity Building Grant 418020. We want to thank the respondents for the survey for participating in the study. We also want to thank John Gosling (JG), Kanupriya Kalia (KK) and Russell Reid (RR) for their input through the design and style stage of this research and Sara Vassallo for her investigation assistance during the preparation of your paper. Author information Depression Anxiety Customer Investigation Unit, Centre for Mental Health Study; The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Tubercidin chemical information Australia. two Centre for Mental Overall health Analysis, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia.14.15. 16.17.Authors’ contributions KG conceived and co-designed the study, undertook statistical analyses with the data and drafted the post. PB and LB co-designed the study and critically edited the report; PB also managed the survey and undertook statistical analyses. AP co-designed the study, extracted potential products and with KG rated themes for inclusion in the GASS. AP also edited the paper.
Look comparison has regularly been shown to engender body image dissatisfaction. To date, most research have demonstrated this connection amongst appearance comparison and body image dissatisfaction within the context of conventional media pictures depicting the thin-ideal. Social comparison theory posits that individuals are a lot more most likely to examine themselves to similar other people. Given that social media forums for example Facebook involve PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300628 one’s peers, the current study aimed to ascertain whether or not the partnership in between appearance comparison and physique image dissatisfaction will be stronger for all those exposed to social media images, compared to conventional media images. Techniques: A sample of 193 female initially year university students have been randomly allocated to view a series of either Facebook or traditional media thin-ideal pictures. Participants completed questionnaires assessing pre- and post- image exposure measures of thin-ideal internalisation, appearance comparison, self-esteem, Facebook use and consuming disorder risk. Results: Kind of exposure was not found to moderate the partnership between look comparison and modifications in body image dissatisfaction. When analysed according to exposure sort, appearance comparison only significantly predicted body image dissatisfaction modify for those exposed to Facebook, but not conventional media. Facebook use was located to predict larger baseline body image dissatisfaction and was connected with larger eating disorder threat. Conclusions: The findings suggest the value of extending the physique image dissatisfaction literature by taking into account emerging social media formats. It really is suggested that interventions for body image dissatisfaction and eating problems contemplate look comparison processes elicited by thin-ideal content on social media forums, for instance Facebook, also to traditional media. Keyword phrases: Body image dissatisfaction, Social media, Appearance comparisonBackground Physique image dissatisfaction (BID), that is definitely, the adverse evaluations of one’s physical body, shape and weight [1], has consistently been implicated within the aetiology and upkeep of eating problems (EDs) [2]. High prices of BID are prevalent amongst young Australian ladies indicating a want to determine the processes contributing to, and perpetuating, BID [5, 6]. BID is postulated to result in the discrepancy be.

Share this post on: