Share this post on:

Owledgements and Funding KG is supported by an NHMRC Fellowship No 524413. The study was also supported by an NHMRC Capacity Constructing Grant 418020. We wish to thank the respondents for the survey for participating in the study. We also wish to thank John Gosling (JG), Kanupriya Kalia (KK) and Russell Reid (RR) for their input throughout the design stage of this investigation and Sara Vassallo for her investigation help through the preparation of your paper. Author information Depression Anxiety Customer Research Unit, Centre for Mental Wellness Study; The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia. two Centre for Mental Overall health Investigation, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia.14.15. 16.17.Authors’ contributions KG conceived and co-designed the study, undertook 3PO site statistical analyses with the data and drafted the report. PB and LB co-designed the study and critically edited the post; PB also managed the survey and undertook statistical analyses. AP co-designed the study, extracted potential things and with KG rated themes for inclusion inside the GASS. AP also edited the paper.
Appearance comparison has regularly been shown to engender physique image dissatisfaction. To date, most studies have demonstrated this relationship involving look comparison and physique image dissatisfaction within the context of traditional media pictures depicting the thin-ideal. Social comparison theory posits that individuals are extra most likely to examine themselves to equivalent other individuals. Since social media forums which include Facebook involve PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300628 one’s peers, the existing study aimed to ascertain whether the relationship among look comparison and body image dissatisfaction could be stronger for those exposed to social media pictures, in comparison with traditional media pictures. Strategies: A sample of 193 female 1st year university students have been randomly allocated to view a series of either Facebook or traditional media thin-ideal images. Participants completed questionnaires assessing pre- and post- image exposure measures of thin-ideal internalisation, look comparison, self-esteem, Facebook use and consuming disorder risk. Final results: Form of exposure was not discovered to moderate the connection between appearance comparison and changes in body image dissatisfaction. When analysed as outlined by exposure form, look comparison only substantially predicted physique image dissatisfaction adjust for those exposed to Facebook, but not conventional media. Facebook use was found to predict higher baseline physique image dissatisfaction and was linked with larger eating disorder risk. Conclusions: The findings suggest the significance of extending the body image dissatisfaction literature by taking into account emerging social media formats. It is suggested that interventions for physique image dissatisfaction and consuming disorders take into consideration look comparison processes elicited by thin-ideal content on social media forums, for instance Facebook, moreover to conventional media. Keyword phrases: Body image dissatisfaction, Social media, Look comparisonBackground Physique image dissatisfaction (BID), which is, the adverse evaluations of one’s physical body, shape and weight [1], has consistently been implicated within the aetiology and maintenance of consuming disorders (EDs) [2]. Higher prices of BID are prevalent among young Australian females indicating a need to identify the processes contributing to, and perpetuating, BID [5, 6]. BID is postulated to outcome from the discrepancy be.

Share this post on: