Share this post on:

Owledgements and Funding KG is supported by an NHMRC 2,3,5,4-Tetrahydroxystilbene 2-O-β-D-glucoside Fellowship No 524413. The study was also supported by an NHMRC Capacity Building Grant 418020. We wish to thank the respondents to the survey for participating inside the study. We also want to thank John Gosling (JG), Kanupriya Kalia (KK) and Russell Reid (RR) for their input through the style stage of this investigation and Sara Vassallo for her investigation assistance during the preparation from the paper. Author details Depression Anxiousness Customer Analysis Unit, Centre for Mental Well being Research; The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 2 Centre for Mental Well being Investigation, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia.14.15. 16.17.Authors’ contributions KG conceived and co-designed the study, undertook statistical analyses of the data and drafted the write-up. PB and LB co-designed the study and critically edited the short article; PB also managed the survey and undertook statistical analyses. AP co-designed the study, extracted potential things and with KG rated themes for inclusion inside the GASS. AP also edited the paper.
Appearance comparison has regularly been shown to engender physique image dissatisfaction. To date, most studies have demonstrated this connection between look comparison and physique image dissatisfaction within the context of traditional media images depicting the thin-ideal. Social comparison theory posits that people are a lot more most likely to examine themselves to similar other individuals. Considering that social media forums including Facebook involve PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300628 one’s peers, the existing study aimed to determine whether or not the connection among look comparison and body image dissatisfaction would be stronger for all those exposed to social media pictures, compared to standard media photos. Solutions: A sample of 193 female 1st year university students were randomly allocated to view a series of either Facebook or standard media thin-ideal pictures. Participants completed questionnaires assessing pre- and post- image exposure measures of thin-ideal internalisation, appearance comparison, self-esteem, Facebook use and consuming disorder threat. Results: Kind of exposure was not located to moderate the relationship between appearance comparison and modifications in physique image dissatisfaction. When analysed based on exposure form, appearance comparison only drastically predicted physique image dissatisfaction alter for those exposed to Facebook, but not traditional media. Facebook use was discovered to predict greater baseline physique image dissatisfaction and was connected with higher consuming disorder risk. Conclusions: The findings suggest the significance of extending the physique image dissatisfaction literature by taking into account emerging social media formats. It is actually advised that interventions for physique image dissatisfaction and eating issues think about look comparison processes elicited by thin-ideal content on social media forums, including Facebook, additionally to traditional media. Keywords and phrases: Physique image dissatisfaction, Social media, Look comparisonBackground Physique image dissatisfaction (BID), that may be, the adverse evaluations of one’s physical body, shape and weight [1], has consistently been implicated within the aetiology and upkeep of consuming issues (EDs) [2]. High rates of BID are prevalent amongst young Australian girls indicating a need to have to recognize the processes contributing to, and perpetuating, BID [5, 6]. BID is postulated to result from the discrepancy be.

Share this post on: