Share this post on:

Owledgements and Funding KG is supported by an NHMRC Fellowship No 524413. The study was also supported by an NHMRC Capacity Building Grant 418020. We wish to thank the respondents towards the survey for participating inside the study. We also wish to thank John Gosling (JG), Kanupriya Kalia (KK) and Russell Reid (RR) for their input during the style stage of this study and Sara Vassallo for her investigation assistance throughout the preparation of your paper. Author particulars Depression Anxiety Customer Analysis Unit, Centre for Mental Wellness Analysis; The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia. two Centre for Mental Overall health Analysis, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia.14.15. 16.17.Authors’ contributions KG conceived and co-designed the study, undertook statistical analyses in the information and drafted the article. PB and LB co-designed the study and critically edited the post; PB also managed the survey and undertook statistical analyses. AP co-designed the study, extracted possible products and with KG rated themes for inclusion inside the GASS. AP also edited the paper.
Look comparison has regularly been shown to engender body image dissatisfaction. To date, most studies have demonstrated this relationship involving look comparison and physique image dissatisfaction in the context of standard media pictures depicting the thin-ideal. Social comparison theory posits that individuals are more most likely to examine themselves to equivalent other people. Due to the fact social media forums like Facebook involve PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300628 one’s peers, the Rheochrysidin web current study aimed to ascertain regardless of whether the connection among look comparison and body image dissatisfaction could be stronger for all those exposed to social media pictures, when compared with traditional media pictures. Procedures: A sample of 193 female initial year university students were randomly allocated to view a series of either Facebook or conventional media thin-ideal images. Participants completed questionnaires assessing pre- and post- image exposure measures of thin-ideal internalisation, look comparison, self-esteem, Facebook use and consuming disorder risk. Results: Kind of exposure was not identified to moderate the partnership between appearance comparison and alterations in body image dissatisfaction. When analysed based on exposure sort, appearance comparison only drastically predicted body image dissatisfaction change for those exposed to Facebook, but not conventional media. Facebook use was identified to predict larger baseline physique image dissatisfaction and was related with larger consuming disorder threat. Conclusions: The findings suggest the importance of extending the physique image dissatisfaction literature by taking into account emerging social media formats. It really is advisable that interventions for physique image dissatisfaction and eating issues take into consideration appearance comparison processes elicited by thin-ideal content material on social media forums, which include Facebook, additionally to conventional media. Keyword phrases: Body image dissatisfaction, Social media, Look comparisonBackground Physique image dissatisfaction (BID), that is, the unfavorable evaluations of one’s physical physique, shape and weight [1], has consistently been implicated within the aetiology and maintenance of consuming issues (EDs) [2]. High prices of BID are prevalent among young Australian girls indicating a require to recognize the processes contributing to, and perpetuating, BID [5, 6]. BID is postulated to result from the discrepancy be.

Share this post on: