Urity threat Perceived drawbacks Efficiency risk Perceived drawbacks Time threat PerceivedUrity threat

Urity threat Perceived drawbacks Efficiency risk Perceived drawbacks Time threat Perceived
Urity threat Perceived drawbacks Overall performance threat Perceived drawbacks Time threat Perceived drawbacks Monetary threat Perceived drawbacks Psychological threat Perceived drawbacks individual innovativeness Perceived benefits Individual innovativeness Perceived drawbacks Personal innovativeness Nitrocefin Anti-infection intention to adopt AVs Social influence Perceived drawbacks Social influence Intention to adopt AVs Options Intention to adopt AVs Social influence AlternativesPath Coefficients 0.377 0.177 0.375 0.370 -0.029 0.053 -0.010 0.105 0.139 -0.032 0.125 -0.031 0.151 -0.021 0.325 0.084 0.T-Value 13.169 11.022 16.159 18.587 1.563 0.713 0.293 3.976 3.768 0.301 9.392 0.882 four.369 0.846 8.348 four.512 2.p-Value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.098 0.508 0.793 0.000 0.000 0.676 0.000 0.390 0.000 0.536 0.000 0.000 0.Empirical Evidence Important ( p) Considerable ( p) Considerable ( p) Considerable ( p) Not important Not important Not significant Considerable ( p) Significant ( p) Not significant Significant ( p) Not substantial Substantial ( p) Not considerable Significant ( p) Significant ( p) Powerful ( p)Note: p 0.025, p 0.005.Sustainability 2021, 13,14 ofThe t-value as well as the degrees of freedom (DF) had been used to calculate the p-value for every with the 17 (Z)-Semaxanib MedChemExpress hypotheses [55], which are all shown in Table 8. All the hypotheses were supported, except for hypotheses H2, H2a, H2e, H2b, H6, and H4 (see Figure three). In the hypotheses, perceived positive aspects exhibited a constructive connection with all the intention to adopt AVs (= 0.37, p 0.000); therefore, H1 was supported. Of its elements, overall performance expectancy (= 0.20, p 0.000), enjoyment (= 0.26, p 0.000), and work expectancy (= 0.44, p 0.000) exhibited optimistic relationships with perceived positive aspects, supporting H1a, H1b, and H1c, respectively. Unexpectedly, the perceived threat had no important hyperlink using the intention to adopt AVs (= -0.029, p 0.05); hence, H2 was not supported. Its components, security threat (= -0.040, p 0.05), functionality risk (= -0.003, p 0.05), and psychological threat (= -0.025, p 0.05) have been also found to be negatively connected to perceived drawbacks, rejecting H2a, H2b, and H2e, respectively. Having said that, time threat (= 0.105, p 0.000) and monetary threat (= 0.142, p 0.000) had good links with Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER Critique 15 of 21 perceived drawbacks, supporting H2c and H2d, respectively. That is certainly, not even safety danger, efficiency risk, or psychological threat created a contribution for the perceived risk.Figure 3. Proposed model with all hypotheses (red indicates unsupported hypothesis). Figure three. Proposed model with all hypotheses (red indicates unsupported hypothesis).For the extended version of your NVM, as hypothesized, individual innovativeness was positively related to the intention to adopt AVs (= 0.151, p 0.000), as had been options (= 0.084, p 0.000) and social influence (= 0.325, p 0.000), supporting H5, H8, and H7, respectively. In addition, individual innovativeness was positively related to perceived benefits (= 0.134, p 0.000), and social influence was positively connected to options (= 0.066, p 0.000); therefore, H3 and H9 had been supported, respectively. Having said that, individual innovativeness was negatively associated to perceived drawbacks (= -0.041, p 0.05), and social influence was negatively associated to perceived drawbacks (= -0.008, p 0.05); therefore, neither H4 nor H6 was supported, respectively. The model could thus explain 69 from the variance in perceived advantages, 24 from the.